How Can a Loving God Condemn so Many to Hell?

Question:

I'm writing because I have a friend who is troubled with the idea that so many people are going to hell according to Christian doctrine. She is uncomfortable with the idea that so many good people, like Gandhi for example, can go to hell just for not accepting Christ, and she is uncomfortable with the notion that entire nations of non-Christian people are condemned to hell.

I regrettably wasn't able to help her much with her doubts because I share many of the same questions as her.

Answer:

I completely understand why you would have these kinds of doubts. There are no easy answers for that one. 

In order to understand my answer, we need to do a quick review on what sin is. The Greek word for sin does not mean "evil," or "bad," or "wicked." Believe it or not, it actually means, "to miss the mark, to be less than perfect, to be imperfect, to fail." This word that simply means "you missed, you weren't perfect" can, in theory, be applied to anything. In fact, it was often applied to archery contests in Greek culture, but in the Bible, it is applied to morality. Thus, our sins are about moral failures, and everything evil that we do or think is, therefore, a moral failure, or "a sin." 

But morally imperfect is NOT the same as hideously evil.

So the whole point of the Bible's position on sin is NOT that we are all in danger of becoming mass murderers, but that we are all, every one of us, morally imperfect. Further, it is not Jesus' fault that we are sinful. We did that to ourselves, and God is not obligated to clean up our mess. So the real and serious problem facing our world is SIN. Sin is real, and no one, not even Gandhi or Mother Theresa is without sin. Every single one of us is morally imperfect.

So why doesn't God just grant everyone salvation? 

Because that is not JUST. There are a lot of truly evil people in the world. Everyone is sinful, but not everyone is as thoroughly evil as a serial killer, or as our culture's favorite bad guy, Hitler. But we can't really grant salvation to all, not if we claim to have some tiny thread of justice in our dealings, when some people really are that evil.

The real problem, though, isn't the truly evil, but those in between the saints and the monsters (which is most of us). How about the majority of us who are somewhere in between? How do we judge the majority of humanity who do some good and some bad?

When you are dealing from a position of perfection, any standard you set is utterly and completely arbitrary. Exactly what percentage of the person's thoughts, words and actions need to be good? 25% 51%? 75%? 99%? And what about omissions? If we fail to do good when we can, how does that figure in? We can’t know what a person really thinks deep down in their heart, but God does. We can't know how many times someone had a chance to do good, and simply walked away, but God does. 

Does a person who is not seriously bad, but also doesn't go out of their way to do anything particularly good, qualify? And how do we weigh thoughts and attitudes against actions? Is a basically good person who makes an foolish choice and kills another person by driving intoxicated better or worse than a person who never really does anything wrong, but is filled with hate, greed, bitterness, covetousness, anger, lust, or envy? What about those socially acceptable sins, like abortion? There are more than 40 million abortions world-wide every year. According to the Guttmacher Institute, which is NOT a pro-life organization, close to 1 out of every 3 women in America will have an abortion by the age of 45 (Go here to see some very startling abortion statistics). How does a God who claims to know us in the womb (Psalm 139:13; Isaiah 44:24; 49:5; Jeremiah 1:5) balance killing our own unborn child against the rest of our life?

And do my good actions account for my evil thoughts? If I do many, many good things, but am filled with lust, how does that balance out?

And once some arbitrary standard is set, is our standard fair to the person who is 1/10 of 1% below that standard?

For a perfect God, anything short of 100% is completely unfair to the person who is the tiniest fraction below whatever arbitrary standard God sets. The only truly just and fair standard is to demand perfection. 100%. That standard is not arbitrary, because it is based on the standard of God Himself, which is the only truly absolute standard. 

And that is the standard God has adopted:

"Therefore be perfect, just as your Father in Heaven is perfect." (Matthew 5:48)

The only problem is that even the best of us cannot meet that standard. Which is where Jesus comes in. He washes away our sin, so that we can be made perfect by his payment. And what does God ask for in return? 

Just trust Me. Really, truly trust me with all your heart. 

And why does He ask for trust? Because the failure in the beginning that created this problem of sin was really about refusing to trust God. The core of our problem, whether we can or cannot see God, is in trusting Him. So why didn't He just reveal Himself to the whole world and say, "trust me, and you get salvation?"

Because if God steps in to offer salvation to the world, then how many of us will be satisfied just with salvation. Won’t we also want Him to solve all of humanity’s problems? We will want Him to heal the sick, feed the poor, and solve our many human ills.

First, that all sounds great, until you remember that His standard is perfection.

It sounds great to have God step in and physically prevent a rape, but not so great to step in and physically prevent me from cheating on my taxes, or on my spouse, or living with my girlfriend, or choosing to have an abortion, or lying, or cussing, or lusting, or coveting, or being greedy, or hating or any of the other myriad things that I might do or think or say that violate God's standards. We humans have a word for that kind of ruler, the kind who literally controls our every word, thought and action: tyrant. 

Remember, real holiness is not just about what we do, it is about our heart. All the evil that men do starts in their hearts. Every less than perfect moral decision, thought, word or deed we have ever done all started in our heart. What we do simply reflects our heart. To be truly holy, our heart has to be completely clean, it has to be perfect. Nothing less than perfect can be allowed.  The thing about perfection is that it is the ultimate zero tolerance standard. 

Second, that takes all the responsibility off of us. When God is solving the world's problems, we don't have to do anything. We don't have to sacrifice to meet other people's needs. We don't have to love those who annoy us. We don't have to grow in character or in spirit. We don't have to become more like Him, because we can just let Him do it all for us.

Make no mistake, some day He is going to show up and do all of this, but when He does, it will be too late. Once we stand before the judge, nothing we do from that point forward effects our case. No one ever sways a court case by telling the judge, "but ever since I got arrested, I've been a completely law abiding citizen."

None of this seems really convincing when faced with the deaths of loved ones who don't believe, or when faced with countries that are more than 99% unbelievers. But the thing we need to keep in mind is that this should motivate us to REACH them, not blame God because He doesn't do the work for us. Remember, God is not obligated in any way to get us out of the mess we put ourselves in. Anything He does, such as sending His Son to stand in our place and take our punishment, is purely a function of grace. God is not obligated nor required to help us.

However, God loves us, so He wants to help us, and He did.

But He did it in a way that reflects His character as well as His standards. Jesus pays for our sins with His death. But we still have that frighteningly mind bending thing God gave humanity at the beginning: free will. God's grace empowers us to accept His gift, but it does not force us to accept it. We can choose to reject this free gift.

Even more frightening is that we can refuse to tell others about this free gift. We can be almost immeasurably selfish by choosing to do the ultimate evil act of omission and disobey the last command from Jesus:

And Jesus came and spoke to them, saying, All authority is given to Me in Heaven and in earth. Therefore go and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all things, whatever I commanded you. And, behold, I am with you all the days until the end of the world. Amen. (Matthew 28:18-20)

If someone truly desires God with all their heart, and seeks Him with all their might, He will reveal Himself to them and answer their prayers no matter where they live.

And you shall seek Me and find Me, when you search for Me with all your heart. (Jeremiah 29:13)

The problem is that very, very few people realize they need God, nor do they seek Him with all their heart. Those who do this on their own are extremely rare. The vast majority of humanity are spiritually asleep, and it is OUR JOB to wake them up to their need, introduce them to their God, and offer them His gift of salvation.

Is Christianity Deceptively Selective About the Commands in the Bible?

Question:

The Bible lists things like eating shellfish right along side homosexuality as equally bad, because both are abominations, yet they [Christians] keep eating shrimp while saying homosexuality is wrong. Isn't this kind of selective obedience to the Bible hypocritical?

Answer:

There are three questions here.

1) Why do Christians seem to selectively pick and choose what parts of the Old Testament they obey?
2) What is an abomination?
3) Are "eating shrimp" and "homosexuality" really classified together in the Old Testament?

And maybe even a fourth question:

4) Are Christians hypocrites?

The simple answer to the first question is that we are told over and over again in the New Testament that the law, and the commands found in the law, no longer apply to those who believe in Jesus, as His death and resurrection have set us free from the law. This is a central issue for Paul, one that he addresses repeatedly in several letters.

For example, by law a married woman is bound to her husband as long as he is alive, but if her husband dies, she is released from the law that binds her to him. So then, if she has sexual relations with another man while her husband is still alive, she is called an adulteress. But if her husband dies, she is released from that law and is not an adulteress if she marries another man. So, my brothers and sisters, you also died to the law through the body of Christ, that you might belong to another, to him who was raised from the dead, in order that we might bear fruit for God. For when we were in the realm of the flesh, the sinful passions aroused by the law were at work in us, so that we bore fruit for death. But now, by dying to what once bound us, we have been released from the law so that we serve in the new way of the Spirit, and not in the old way of the written code. (Romans 7:2-6)

Paul insists that this is a central tenet of Christianity. The law could make us aware that we are not righteous, but it could not make us righteous. It could make us aware of our sin, but it could not cleanse us of our sin. That is why Jesus' death and resurrection were so important.

I have been crucified with Christ and I no longer live, but Christ lives in me. The life I now live in the body, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me. I do not set aside the grace of God, for if righteousness could be gained through the law, Christ died for nothing! (Galatians 2:20-21)

However, something that becomes clear in Paul's writings on the law is that the moral commandments in the law are simply an expression of God's character, and as such, are eternal. Both Paul and Jesus constantly insist that the moral part of the law is still binding on believers, because the moral commands embody the heart of God that we be holy and loving. Further, just for clarity, virtually every moral law from the Old Testament is repeated in the New Testament.

The part of the law that was ceremonial, such as the cleanliness laws, dietary laws, festivals, sacrifices and so on were intended to point us to Christ, and those were never really intended to be eternal. You can still do them if you really, really want to, but there is not really a point to it any more. They are just a shadow; Jesus has come, and He is the reality that they were pointing to all along. So live the reality, not the shadow.

Therefore do not let anyone judge you by what you eat or drink, or with regard to a religious festival, a New Moon celebration or a Sabbath day. These are a shadow of the things that were to come; the reality, however, is found in Christ. (Colossians 2:16-17)

Thus, none of the dietary commands are binding on believers, but the commands to be truthful, to refrain from adultery, theft, murder, coveting and so on are all still in effect. This means that Christians are not really "picking and choosing" which parts of the Old Testament they want to keep, and throwing out the stuff they don't want to keep. The quick and dirty guideline is this: if it is a moral command, it is still binding (and has been repeated in the New Testament), if it is a ceremonial law (sacrifices, dietary, cleanliness, festivals, etc.), it is no longer required for followers of Jesus Christ.

Second, is an abomination a especially horrible sin?

The Hebrew word usually translated "abomination," תּועבה, means "disgusting, loathsome, nasty, horrible," but here is the really important part: this word appears 117 times in the Old Testament, and is attached to virtually every moral or idolatrous sin in the Bible. Among the sins listed as abominations are (in alphabetical order), adultery, atheism, bestiality, breaking a vow, cheating, creating discord, demon worship, evil schemes, hardening the heart, homosexuality, incest, justifying wickedness, lying, magic, murder, oppressing the poor, pride, shedding innocent blood, theft, and violence. And this is not an exhaustive list.

The point is simply that God finds all sin disgusting. Sin is an abomination to God.

Ironically, despite this common connection in our culture, one of the things not on this list is eating shrimp.

There is a second Hebrew word, שׁקץ, that is used almost exclusively of foods that are ceremonially unclean. It only appears 11 times in the Old Testament, and means, "filthy, dirty, polluted, very unclean." In some translations, such as the KJV, this word is also translated "abomination." This is the word used in the passages where Israel is forbidden from eating shellfish (which would include shrimp).

So are homosexuality and eating shrimp really equated in the Bible? No. Homosexuality is treated as a moral issue while eating shrimp is an issue of ceremonial cleanliness (meaning the ban on eating shrimp has been lifted in the New Testament).

On the other hand, contrary to what some seem to imply, homosexuality is not treated as some especially horrible sin that is set apart in God's mind from all other sins. Sin is sin, and God finds all sin disgusting (an abomination), including that lie you told last week, the time you gossiped back in middle school, and the pencil you stole from work. However, while God clearly finds all sin disgusting, He really does know the difference between something that is truly evil, such as plotting and carrying out a murder, and a victimless sin, such as stealing a paper clip. All are equally sin, but they are not all equally evil. See my post, "Do All Roads Lead to God?" for a more in depth discussion of the difference between "sin" and "evil," and the real meaning of "sin."

So the bottom line is that the Old Testament law has moral commands that are eternally binding on all believers, while it also has ceremonial laws which were always intended to be temporary, point to something greater, and now that the greater, Jesus, has arrived, they are no longer binding on believers. In other words, God Himself has given us permission to be selective in what we obey concerning ceremonial laws.

Theologically speaking, there is  much more to this, but there is no where near enough room in this forum for what God was really doing with those ceremonial laws, and why it is that Jesus said, "I did not come to abolish the law, but to fulfill it," as well as why Paul calls the "fulfilled" law, "the Law of the Spirit of Life."

As for the last question, "Are Christians hypocrites?"

Frankly, in the strictest sense, yes we are. We constantly preach holiness and love, yet are often sinful and selfish. We talk about being set free from sin, yet all too often there is no discernible difference in our behavior from that of any self proclaimed modern pagan. The difference, however, is that most of us are aware that we are imperfect, that we are constantly failing, and that we are unlikely to attain a true moral perfection in this life. We don't claim to be perfectly sinless, we claim to be forgiven, to be washed, and to have access to a God who is, little by little, helping us correct the flaws in our character so that we can sin less and less. And because we are so keenly aware of our own failings, we have no desire to beat you up about yours. We once were where you are now, we have not forgotten it, and we are deeply aware that our current state is due to Jesus, not to anything we did.

A real hypocrite is not the person that Christ is gradually healing who is trying to help you find that same healing for your wounds; a real hypocrite is the person who stands above you bruised and bleeding, claiming to have no injuries of any kind, while castigating you for your cuts and lacerations. The real hypocrite tries to make you feel like you are less so they can be more. The real believer treats you like you are priceless, worth every minute and effort, and that you can become more like Jesus, not more like them.

In other words, the essence of the hypocrite is pride, arrogance and selfishness, while the essence of the believer is humility, humbleness, and selflessness. And we freely admit we are not there yet. 

We who believe in Jesus and have the eternal life He promised are on a journey, and much to our delight, there is room on this bus, right here next to us, for you to join in the journey.